Arushi again.
After closer report by CBI in Arushi murder case the news could not be digest by TV media and it started blowing against CBI for negligence in conducting investigation and showing disrespect and alleging violation of so called women’s right. The Women Commission’s chairperson also showed concern over it and the climax was that the Union Law Minister not only showed interest but summoned the Directed and literally asked to reopen the investigation.
Why so much importance in such normal usual murder case. There was nothing unusual in the murder case. It appears that there are some vested interests of TV media and other persons and hence so hue and cry is being made in the case from the very beginning.
Virtually this is interference in the work of CBI. Last day the then Union Minister Suresh Pachiry who is president of M.P. blamed the Lokayukat Police for exonerating the CM of the M.P. state saying that since Lokayukt Police works under the control of the state government it was inevitable that he was to be exonerated. Think Pachori that he did not allege against Lokayukt that he is also being appointed by the state government such report was inevitable. Here Pachori, though half heartily shoed maturity in issuing such statement! What wrong does the opposition parties do if they make allegations against CBI that it works under pressure of the Ruling Congress?
Why any Law Minister did no show any interest in Bofor’s case or other important scams and summoned the Director to have active investigation in them? The burning example is of G2 Spectrum scam in which due to the present government policies the case could not be investigated till the Supreme Court did not scold the government.
It is learnt that Arushi was to get huge money, property and other wealth and there was time for her attend majority. the key points for investigation may be she might have been murdered by the deceased servant at the instance of her parents and then the servant who might have murdered her was also murdered by giving Supari! Nothing shocking. Such act is called causing disappearance of evidence of offence or giving false information to screen offender. This is well defined under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Parents of Arushi should not be forgotten that the CBI had also arrested them in the matter but for want of ‘strong’ and ‘cogent’ evidence Charge Sheet could not be filed against them. Remember that all the three servants had been given clean chit. Hence prima facie it is evident that it is her parents who might be responsible for such offence. If the case is reopened the reverse may be the result. The parents may take by surprise so as to place in an embarrassing or disadvantageous situation
